The Religious Consultation
on Population, Reproductive Health  and Ethics
 


 revisiting the world's sacred traditions



A CATHOLIC WORD IN DEFENSE OF POOR WOMEN AND GAYS

Catholic Theology vs. Vatican Theology

By Daniel C. Maguire

The New York Times (Editorial Nov. 10) put it clearly. Under “pressure” from "the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, lawmakers added language that would prevent millions of Americans from buying insurance that covers abortions—even if they use their own money. Some women who have coverage for abortion services through policies bought by small employers could actually lose that coverage if their employer decides to transfer its workers to the exchange. Ultimately, if large employers are permitted to make use of the exchange, ever larger numbers of women might lose abortion coverage that they now have."

This “pressure” and successful influence on the drafting of U.S. law, is being applied by the U.S. bishops working from their tax exempt properties. “Tax exempt,” of course means tax shifted to other tax payers, including the women whose rights the bishops are attacking.

This is mainly an attack on the poor. Affluent women will have no problem getting an abortion—they never have. This is one more example of Operation Kill Choice waged successfully for years by the Republican Party and the Religious Right.

The goal of the operation is, step by step, to give control of pregnancies to the government and take it away from pregnant women. Poor women are an easy target.

If poor women are denied support for their abortion decisions, they will find unsafe alternatives as they did before Roe v. Wade. The major change after Roe v Wade was not the birth rate, but the decline in female mortality. Whole hospital wards reserved for women with botched abortions were closed as I saw in Philadelphia General Hospital. There is nothing “pro-life” about putting government in charge of pregnant women. Women with problem pregnancies will seek abortions. They always have. If they are deprived of financial support and even the opportunity to buy insurance to cover abortions. female mortality will rise among the poor. Jesus announced his mission as “good news for the poor:” This mission of the bishops is not.

Failing Grades in Theology

Aside from law-altering politicking from tax exempt properties the bishops also sin by ignorance. Theological ignorance. Bishops are pastors and administrators (when they are not lobbying on capitol hill and trying to impose their minority views on the broader American public.) They are not professional theologians and most could not pass a graduate exam in theology. Most of the real Catholic theologians sin by timidity, sitting mutely on their hands in libraries, while the bishops pontificate publicly as though they were the true experts on Catholic teaching.

As theologian Regina Schulte says, the bishops are using the poor as pawns in their power ploy, backing out of social services sooner than give aid to gay couples and claiming theological warranty for doing so. This is what they are doing now in Washington, D. C. In point of fact the bishops should know—but don’t—that Catholic theology, which is broader, more ecumenical, more professional, more scholarly, and better informed by real life experience than hierarchical teaching, blesses same sex unions.

A distinction must be made between Vatican theology and Catholic theology. Vatican theology still teaches that a spouses may not use a condom even if their partners are HIV positive! Catholic theology finds that not just erroneous, but lethally so.

A Prayer Time-out for Bishops


The bishops should stop their lobbying in congressional offices and kneel for a moment to say a prayer to Saints Serge and Bacchus, fourth century male saints, whose marriage to one another is depicted in a seventh century icon housed in the Kiev Museum of Eastern and Western Art. Jesus is in the picture as the pronubus, or “best man,” the official witness of the same sex union.

While in a prayerful mood, the bishop should then pray to Saint Antoninus, Archbishop of Florence, canonized in 1523, and the premier theologian of marriage in his day. Regarding abortion, this saintly bishop was pro-choice for early abortions when necessary to save the woman’s life, a large category involving many abortions in the medical conditions of that day. A prayer to their saintly pro-choice predecessor could help to illumine the minds of theologically challenged bishops. Any policy that adversely affects the poor sends alerts to Gospel-formed consciences.

Regarding Tom Reese’s statement

However, remarrying after a divorce is also against Catholic teaching, yet the church gives health care benefits to divorced and remarried couples. No one believes that the church has changed its teaching on divorce. No one will believe that the church has changed its teaching on gay sex if it provides medical benefits to gay couples.

If you identify "Catholic teaching" and "church teaching"with hierarchical teaching, you shrink the church and ignore its other magisteria. Catholic teaching on remarrying after divorce and on gay sex is considerably more diverse than hierarchical teaching. As Avery Dulles said in his presidential address for the Catholic Theological Society of America, certain teaching of the hierarchy "seem to evade in a calculated way the findings of modern scholarship. They are drawn up without broad consultation with the theological community. Instead, a few carefully selected theologians are asked to defend a pre-established position." Dulles speaks of"two magisteria—that of the pastors and that of the theologians," magisteria he saw as "complementary and mutually corrective." The theological magisterium may critique the hierarchical magisterium. Said Dulles: "We shall insist on the right, where we think it important for the good of the Church, to urge positions at variance with those that are presently official." (Dulles was overlooking the magisterial role of the sensus fidelium but he was two thirds right.)

Remarriage after divorce and gay unions are blessed by the Catholic teaching of Probabilism. The D.C. bishop apparently is unaware of this, largely, I sadly say, due to the all too silent American Catholic theologate that allows bishops who are pastors and administrators, not professional theologians, to expatiate publicly as the one true voice of Catholic wisdom—to the great embarrassment of the church and to the harassment of gay and remarried Catholics.

Back to Top

Send this page to a friend!

Home   About Us   Newsletters   News Archives   Donate