| |

on Population,
Reproductive Health and Ethics
Home | News
Archives | Newsletters
| About Us | Donate
Summary
of Sacred Choices
Roman Catholicism
When the pope says that no Catholic woman may choose contraception or
an abortion in any circumstance however serious, how can a Catholic woman
feel morally free to make that choice? The reason is that the pope's opinion
is only one of the perfectly legitimate and orthodox Catholic opinions.
According to traditional Catholic theology--unknown even to many Catholics--
a Catholic is free to choose contraception and abortion when necessary.
As has happened before in Church history, papal teaching on this issue
of morality will probably also follow the lead of the theologians and
many Catholics, according to Catholic theologian Christine Gudorf. As
she says, "the foundations of the old bans have been razed."
Judaism
Judaism, like most religions, begins with the mandate to "choose
life." It recognizes however, that choosing life can at times mean
choosing death, as in cases of killing in self defense. There can, according
to Judaism, also be occasions to defend values essential to life by choosing
an abortion. This is facilitated in Judaism, as theologian Laurie Zoloth
says, because the "fetus is not seen as being an ensouled person."
Even in the last trimester, she says, "the fetus has a lesser moral
status." As an ancient Jewish text puts it, abortion "is not
forbidden when it is done because of a great need."
Islam
In Islam, as in all religions, there is always a diversity of opinions,
and there are those in Islam who oppose all abortions. However, there
is broad acceptance in the major Islamic teachings of abortion in the
first four months of pregnancy. Most of the revered teachers in Islam
hold that abortion is permissible for serious reasons. Even late-term
abortions are permitted when there is danger to the mother's life. Family
planning is accepted as a moral need by most Muslims.
Protestant Christianity
Protestantism, the dominant religious affiliation in the United States
and in many countries, is firmly in favor of family planning. However
noisy the anti-choice conservatives in Protestantism are, they do not
represent mainstream Protestantism. More typical of Protestantism is the
statement of the General Board of the American Baptist Churches in 1988.
Conceding that some oppose all abortions, they say "May others advocate
for and support family planning legislation, including legalized abortion
as being in the best interest of women in particular and society in general."
Civil law should not take sides in this debate. To do so is to violate
the human right to religious freedom.
Jainism
The principle of AHIMSA, doing no harm is central to Jainism. On the
basis of this some Jains conclude that all abortion is wrong. However,on
the basis of the very same principle some Jains conclude that there are
situations when abortion is the least harmful choice because of medical
or other reasons. On that basis, then, they would justify abortion when
necessary to prevent greater harm. Abortion can be the least harmful option
in some cases and a person of the Jain faith can choose abortion for serious
reasons without betraying their faith.
Buddhism
A Buddhist woman can have an abortion and still be a good Buddhist. This
does not mean that there is nothing negative about abortion. All could
agree that it would be better if no abortions were needed, and in a perfect
world that might be possible. This world is not perfect. Buddhism, like
the other religions of the world, faces the fact that abortion may sometimes
be the best decision and a truly moral choice. Buddhists have a long experience
with family planning, including abortion.
Hinduism
Arguments for family planning can be drawn from the main moral teachings
of Hinduism and Jainism. DHARMA emphasizes the need to act "for the
sake of the good of the world." Producing more children than you
or the environment can support is not "for the sake of the good of
the world." Overpopulating beyond your means or society's capacity
is claiming more than you have a right to. It violates AHIMSA and all
the other fundamental moral commitments of Hinduism. Not surprisingly,
therefore, abortion has been legal in India since 1971 with the passing
of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and religious objections to
it are very rare.
Native American Religions
Native religions discouraged overburdening the land with over-population
and women usually set the tone regarding this, and also regarding family
planning, including abortion. Speaking for her tradition a woman of the
Ojibwe people said: "It is a disgrace to have children like steps
and stairs. If a man had sense, he didn't bother his wife while a child
was young." A Lakota woman put it this way: "Anything that has
to do with our bodies is really our business as women, and as Lakota women,
it is part of our culture to make our own decision about abortion."
A 1991 Women of Color Reproductive Health Poll showed that 80 percent
of native women hold this view.
The Chinese Religions, Taoism, Confucianism, Buddhism
Abortion is always a thorny issue, an unfortunate necessity at best.
The Chinese religions with their stress on harmony and compassion addressed
abortion and saw it as justifiable in certain circumstances. Chinese scholar
Geling Shang says: "The Chinese have employed abortion for various
reasons since ancient times." He says there was "no explicit
code" to prohibit it. "Chinese attitudes toward abortion were
mostly tolerant and compassionate. People did not think it was wrong unless
it was done unnecessarily."
Home
Other Sacred Choices web links:
About
the Author of Sacred Choices
Preface
Initiative
Scholars
FAQ
Buy
the Book
Study
Guide
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized
by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts
to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit
to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|


|